Current Issue
Volume: 122
Number: 4
Index: July 2010
Clinical Focus: Neurological disorders and depression
Call For Papers
September 2010
Clinical Focus: ADHD, Allergies, Immunization, and Diabetes
  • Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder:
    • ADHD
      • Treating children, adolescents, and adults
      • Pharmacotherapy options
      • Switching medication dosages
      • Treating ADHD in patients with concomitant disorders
      • Clinical trial developments
    • Oppositional defiant disorder
  • Immunization and pediatrics:
    • Vaccinations for infants, children, and adults:
      • HPV
      • Meningococcal
      • Influenza
    • Physical examinations for back-to-school
    • Allergy medications
    • Treating asthma in children and adolescents
  • Diabetes:
    • Juvenile diabetes
    • New drug developments for type 1 and type 2 diabetes
    • Pen devices
    • Managing diabetes in patients with concomitant disorders:
      • Obesity
      • Metabolic syndrome
      • Cardiovascular disease
      • Chronic kidney disease
      • Hypertension
    • Clinical trials, DPP-4 inhibitors, and investigational drugs
    • Diabetes in different patient populations:
      • African Americans
      • Hispanics
    • Diabetic complications:
      • Hypoglycemia
      • Macrovascular
      • Nephropathy Ocular
Submission deadline: August 02
Fast-Track deadline: August 10
About
Fast-Track peer review is available for those papers requiring immediate review (for an additional fee). Complete peer review is finalized in 1-2 weeks and comments are provided to the author within 72 hours of their receipt by the editorial office. Authors are asked to submit a revised manuscript within 10-12 days. Accepted manuscripts are processed within 2-3 weeks, published online within 3 business days of final author approval, and in print in the next available issue.
Submissions
*NEW* Submit your FAST-TRACK manuscript online today. It's fast, it's easy! Just follow the detailed instructions, fill in all the required fields, and upload your manuscript.
Get started NOW!
Contacts
Libraries:
sitelicenses@postgradmed.com

Reprints:
reprints@postgradmed.com

Subscriptions:
subscriptions@postgradmed.com

Supplements:
supplements@postgradmed.com

Document Delivery Services 1946-2010:
documentdelivery@postgradmed.com

Editorial:
editor-in-chief@postgradmed.com editorial@postgradmed.com

Website:
support@postgradmed.com

Managing Director:
John Elduff
Phone: 610-889-3732
Fax: 1-866-297-3168
j.elduff@postgradmed.com

General Information
Phone: 610-889-3730
Fax: 1-866-297-3168
1235 Westlakes Drive
Suite 320
Berwyn, PA 19312
September 8, 2010
Index - Table of Content - Article Abstract
Related Articles
  1. ALPHA1-BLOCKER COMBINATION THERAPY FOR HYPERTENSION
    An option to try when traditional methods fail
  2. Introduction
  3. Hypertension In Women And The Elderly
    Some Puzzling And Some Expected Findings Of Treatment Studies
Weekly Poll
Advertisement image
doi: 10.3810/pgm.2010.05.2161
Postgraduate Medicine: Volume 122: No.3
The Utility of Observational Studies in Clinical Decision Making:
Lessons Learned from Statin Trials
JoAnne M. Foody, MD; Phillip M. Mendys, PharmD; Larry Z. Liu, MD, PhD; And Ross J. Simpson Jr, MD, PhD
Abstract: Contemporary clinical decision making is well supported by a wide variety of information sources, including clinical practice guidelines, position papers, and insights from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Much of our fundamental understanding of cardiovascular risk factors is based on multiple observations from major epidemiologic studies, such as The Seven Country Studies and the US-based Framingham Heart Study. These studies provided the framework for the development of clinical practice guidelines, including the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel series. The objective of this article is to highlight the value of observational studies as a complement to clinical trial data for clinical decision making in real-world practice. Although RCTs are still the benchmark for assessing clinical efficacy and safety of a specific therapeutic approach, they may be of limited utility to practitioners who must then adapt the lessons learned from the trial into the patient care environment. The use of well-structured observational studies can improve our understanding of the translation of clinical trials into clinical practice, as demonstrated here with the example of statins. Although such studies have their own limitations, improved techniques for design and analysis have reduced the impact of bias and confounders. The introduction of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines has provided more uniformity for such studies. When used together with RCTs, observational studies can enhance our understanding of effectiveness and utility in real-world clinical practice. In the examples of statin observational studies, the results suggest that relative effectiveness of different statins and potential impact of switching statins should be carefully considered in treating individual patients by practicing physicians.

Keywords: statins; observational study; randomized controlled trials; hypertension

(read)

Back to the table of contents for the May 2010 issue